Waking Up With Sam Harris #62 – What is True? (with Jordan B. Peterson)

https://youtu.be/1gdpyzwOOYY

In this episode of the Waking Up podcast, Sam Harris speaks with psychologist Jordan B. Peterson about freedom of speech and the nature of truth.

Jordan B. Peterson is a clinical psychologist and Professor at the University of Toronto. He formerly taught at Harvard University and has published numerous articles on drug abuse, alcoholism, and aggression. He is the author of Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief.

Elon Musk compares A.I. efforts to “Summoning the Demon”

https://youtu.be/JfJjx12wkVQ

Elon Musk spoke at MIT for an event marking the 100th anniversary of its Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. During the Q&A session, Elon warned of the civilisation dangers of Artificial Intelligence if not contained.

Waking Up With Sam Harris #57 – An Evening with Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris (1)

https://youtu.be/SYhtW-K90zY

In this episode of the Waking Up podcast, Sam Harris speaks with Richard Dawkins at a live event in Los Angeles (first of two). They cover religion, Jurassic Park, artificial intelligence, elitism, continuing human evolution, and other topics.

Waking Up with Sam Harris #61 – The Power of Belief (with Lawrence Wright)

https://youtu.be/_-OGgAArIBk

In this episode of the Waking Up podcast, Sam Harris speaks with author Lawrence Wright about al-Qaeda & ISIS, Arab culture, 9/11 conspiracy theories, the migrant crisis in Europe, Scientology, parallels between L. Ron Hubbard and Donald Trump, the Satanic cult panic, and other topics.

Lawrence Wright is an author, screenwriter, playwright, and a staff writer for The New Yorker magazine. His works of nonfiction include In the New World, Remembering Satan, The Looming Tower, Going Clear, and Thirteen Days in September. He has also written a novel, God’s Favorite. His books have received many prizes and honors, including a Pulitzer Prize for The Looming Tower. His most recent book is The Terror Years: From al-Qaeda to the Islamic State.

Want to support the Waking Up podcast?

Please visit: http://www.samharris.org/support

Subscribe to the podcast: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNAxrHudMfdzNi6NxruKPLw?sub_confirmation=1

Get the email newsletter: https://www.samharris.org/email_signup

Follow Sam Harris on Twitter: https://twitter.com/samharrisorg

Follow Sam Harris on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Sam-Harris-22457171014/?fref=ts

For more information about Sam Harris: https://www.samharris.org


For more interesting articles, visit: Kemk

Jedes Kind kennt Gut und Böse: Wie das Gewissen entsteht

http://amzn.to/2jJzieb

Böse Kinder gibt es nicht. Kaum auf der Welt, haben sie schon ein feines Gespür für Gut und Böse. In Langzeitstudien konnte Paul Bloom beobachten, wie die ganz Kleinen bereits Gefühle wie Mitleid, Schuld und Scham zeigen, gutes Verhalten bei anderen belohnen und schlechtes bestrafen. Der renommierte Entwicklungspsychologe der Yale University führt aus, wie sich das angeborene Mitgefühl weiterentwickelt und wie Eltern und Erzieher die natürlichen Anlagen der Kinder zum Guten und ihren Sinn für Gerechtigkeit zur Entfaltung bringen können.

»Ein Muss für alle Eltern und alle sozialwissenschaftlich Interessierten.« Dan Ariely

Produktbeschreibungen

Pressestimmen

“Der renommierte Entwicklungspsychologe der Yale University führt aus, wie sich das angeborene Mitgefühl weiterentwickelt und wie Eltern und Erzieher die natürlichen Anlagen der Kinder zum Guten und in ihrem Sinn für Gerechtigkeit zur Entfaltung bringten können”
lernwel.at, 01.08.2014

“Es sind Widersprüche (..), denen Paul Bloom nachgeht. Er hat kein Wohlfühlbuch geschrieben, das einen geradlinigen Weg vom Moralsinn des Babys hin zu einem Immanuel Kant oder John Stuart Mill aufzeigt. Denn trotz ihrer biologischen Basis sei Moral keine Selbstverständlichkeit, betont der Psychologe.”
Deutschlandradio Kutlur (online), 08.06.2015

“‘Jedes Kind kennt Gut und Böse’ zieht ein vorläufiges Fazit eines jungen Forschusfeldes, das noch viele offene Fragen und widersprüchliche Ergebnisse beinhaltet.”
Main-Echo, 15.04.2015

Über den Autor und weitere Mitwirkende

Paul Bloom ist Professor für Psychologie an der Yale University. Er ist Träger zahlreicher Wissenschaftspreise und einer der führenden Intellektuellen der USA. Er schreibt häufig u.a. für die Zeitschriften: “The New York Times Magazine”, “The Atlantic”, “Science”, “Slate”, “The Best American Science Writing”. Bloom lebt mit seiner Frau und zwei Söhnen in New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

http://www.droemer-knaur.de/buch/7986300/jedes-kind-kennt-gut-und-boese

You are a Simulation & Physics Can Prove It: George Smoot at TEDxSalford

Astrophysicist, cosmologist and Nobel Prize winner George Smoot studies the cosmic microwave background radiation — the afterglow of the Big Bang. His pioneering research into deep space and time is uncovering the structure of the universe itself. He has also made a cameo appearance (as himself) in an episode of the ‘Big Bang Theory.’

George Smoot looks into the farthest reaches of space to the oldest objects in the known universe: fluctuations in the remnants of creation. Using data collected from satellites such as COBE and WMAP, scanning the cosmic microwave background radiation (a relic of the heat unleashed after the Big Bang), he probes the shape of the universe. In 1992 he and his Berkeley team discovered that the universe, once thought to be smooth and uniform at the largest scale, is actually anisotropic — or varied and lumpy. Smoot continues to investigate of the structure of the universe at the University of California at Berkeley, mapping billions of galaxies and filaments of dark matter in hope of uncovering the secrets of the universe’s origins.

Is the Universe a Simulation?

2016 Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate: Is the Universe a Simulation?
American Museum of Natural History

What may have started as a science fiction speculation—that perhaps the universe as we know it is a computer simulation—has become a serious line of theoretical and experimental investigation among physicists, astrophysicists, and philosophers.

Neil deGrasse Tyson, Frederick P. Rose Director of the Hayden Planetarium, hosts and moderates a panel of experts in a lively discussion about the merits and shortcomings of this provocative and revolutionary idea. The 17th annual Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate took place at The American Museum of Natural History on April 5, 2016.

2016 Asimov Panelists:

David Chalmers
Professor of philosophy, New York University

Zohreh Davoudi
Theoretical physicist, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

James Gates
Theoretical physicist, University of Maryland

Lisa Randall
Theoretical physicist, Harvard University

Max Tegmark
Cosmologist, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The late Dr. Isaac Asimov, one of the most prolific and influential authors of our time, was a dear friend and supporter of the American Museum of Natural History. In his memory, the Hayden Planetarium is honored to host the annual Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate — generously endowed by relatives, friends, and admirers of Isaac Asimov and his work — bringing the finest minds in the world to the Museum each year to debate pressing questions on the frontier of scientific discovery. Proceeds from ticket sales of the Isaac Asimov Memorial Debates benefit the scientific and educational programs of the Hayden Planetarium.

Waking Up With Sam Harris #60 – An Evening with Richard Dawkins (Part 2)

https://youtu.be/0namBRjdKng

In this episode of the Waking Up podcast, Sam Harris speaks with Richard Dawkins at a live event in Los Angeles (second of two). They discuss Richard’s experience of having a stroke, the genetic future of humanity, the analogy between genes and memes, the “extended phenotype,” Islam and bigotry, the biology of race, how to find meaning without religion, and other topics.

Want to support the Waking Up podcast?

Please visit: http://www.samharris.org/support

Subscribe to the podcast: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNAxrHudMfdzNi6NxruKPLw?sub_confirmation=1

Get the email newsletter: https://www.samharris.org/email_signup

Follow Sam Harris on Twitter: https://twitter.com/samharrisorg

Follow Sam Harris on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Sam-Harris-22457171014/?fref=ts

For more information about Sam Harris: https://www.samharris.org


For more interesting articles, visit: Kemk

A black hole in your pocket?


Transcript


1
00:00:00,000 –> 00:00:04,264
What would happen to you if a black hole the size of a coin suddenly appeared near you?

3
00:00:04,836 –> 00:00:05,887
Short answer: you’d die.

4
00:00:06,351 –> 00:00:07,424
Long answer: it depends.

5
00:00:08,081 –> 00:00:09,169
Is it a black hole with
the mass of a coin,

6
00:00:09,963 –> 00:00:11,017
or is it as wide as a coin?

7
00:00:11,503 –> 00:00:14,549
Suppose a US nickel with
the mass of about 5 grams

8
00:00:14,963 –> 00:00:16,975
magically collapsed into a black hole.

9
00:00:17,083 –> 00:00:20,139
This black hole would have a radius
of about 10 to the power of −30 meters.

10
00:00:20,645 –> 00:00:24,727
By comparison, a hydrogen atom is about
10 to the power of −11 meters.

11
00:00:25,465 –> 00:00:27,564
So the black hole compared
to an atom is as small as

12
00:00:28,455 –> 00:00:29,531
an atom compared to the Sun.

13
00:00:30,215 –> 00:00:31,282
Unimaginably small!

14
00:00:31,885 –> 00:00:34,964
And a small black hole would also have
an unimaginably short lifetime

15
00:00:35,675 –> 00:00:36,736
to decay by Hawking radiation.

16
00:00:37,285 –> 00:00:42,302
It would radiate away what little mass it
has in 10 to the power of −23 seconds.

17
00:00:42,455 –> 00:00:46,532
Its 5 grams of mass will be converted
to 450 terajoules of energy,

18
00:00:47,225 –> 00:00:50,246
which will lead to an explosion
roughly 3 times bigger than

19
00:00:50,246 –> 00:00:53,283
the atomic bombs dropped on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.

20
00:00:53,627 –> 00:00:54,674
In this case, you die.

21
00:00:55,097 –> 00:00:56,195
You also lose the coin.

22
00:00:57,092 –> 00:00:59,170
If the black hole had the
diameter of a common coin,

23
00:00:59,088 –> 00:01:01,341
then it would be considerably
more massive.

24
00:01:02,133 –> 00:01:05,265
In fact, a black hole with
the diameter of a nickel

25
00:01:05,265 –> 00:01:07,286
would be slightly more
massive than the Earth.

26
00:01:07,475 –> 00:01:10,547
It would have a surface gravity
a billion billion times greater

27
00:01:11,195 –> 00:01:12,202
than our planet currently does.

28
00:01:12,895 –> 00:01:14,953
Its tidal forces on you would be so strong

29
00:01:15,483 –> 00:01:17,567
that they’d rip your
individual cells apart.

30
00:01:18,323 –> 00:01:22,330
The black hole would consume you before
you even realized what’s happening.

31
00:01:22,393 –> 00:01:24,419
Although the laws of gravity
are still the same,

32
00:01:24,657 –> 00:01:27,692
the phenomenon of gravity that you’d
experience would be very different

33
00:01:28,007 –> 00:01:29,091
around such dense objects.

34
00:01:29,087 –> 00:01:30,169
The range of the gravitational attraction

35
00:01:31,702 –> 00:01:33,729
extends over the entire
observable universe,

36
00:01:33,972 –> 00:01:36,974
with gravity getting weaker the farther
away you are from something.

37
00:01:37,172 –> 00:01:41,221
On Earth right now, your head and your
toes are approximately the same distance

38
00:01:41,662 –> 00:01:42,708
from the center of our planet.

39
00:01:43,122 –> 00:01:45,179
But if you stood on
a nickel-sized black hole,

40
00:01:45,692 –> 00:01:47,771
your feet would be hundreds
of times closer to the center,

41
00:01:48,482 –> 00:01:51,556
and the gravitational force would be
tens of thousands of times as large

42
00:01:52,231 –> 00:01:55,276
as the force on your head and
rip you into a billion pieces.

43
00:01:55,681 –> 00:01:57,730
But the black hole wouldn’t
stop with just you.

44
00:01:58,171 –> 00:02:01,200
The black hole is now a
dominant gravitational piece

45
00:02:01,461 –> 00:02:03,520
of the
Earth–Moon–Black-Hole-of-Death system.

46
00:02:04,051 –> 00:02:07,122
You might think that the black hole would
sink towards the center of the planet

47
00:02:07,761 –> 00:02:09,795
and consume it from the inside out.

48
00:02:10,101 –> 00:02:14,154
In fact, the Earth also moves up onto the black hole and begins to bob around,

49
00:02:14,631 –> 00:02:15,638
as if it were orbiting the black hole,

50
00:02:16,331 –> 00:02:18,405
all while having swathes of mass eaten with each pass,

51
00:02:19,071 –> 00:02:20,133
which is much more creepy.

52
00:02:21,049 –> 00:02:23,100
As the Earth is eaten up from the inside,

53
00:02:23,559 –> 00:02:25,613
it collapses into a
scattered disk of hot rock,

54
00:02:26,099 –> 00:02:28,125
surrounding the black hole
in a tight orbit.

55
00:02:28,359 –> 00:02:31,364
The black hole slowly doubles its mass
by the time it’s done feeding.

56
00:02:31,859 –> 00:02:33,954
The Moon’s orbit is now highly elliptical.

57
00:02:34,809 –> 00:02:36,857
The effects on the Solar system
are awesome—

58
00:02:37,289 –> 00:02:41,289
in the Biblical sense of awesome,
which means terrifying.

59
00:02:41,298 –> 00:02:44,374
Tidal forces from the black hole would
probably disrupt the near-Earth asteroids,

60
00:02:45,058 –> 00:02:47,092
maybe even parts of the asteroid belt,

61
00:02:47,042 –> 00:02:49,084
sending rocks careening
through the Solar system.

62
00:02:49,847 –> 00:02:51,930
Bombardment and impacts
may become commonplace

63
00:02:52,677 –> 00:02:53,725
for the next few million years.

64
00:02:54,157 –> 00:02:58,157
The planets are slightly perturbed, but
stay approximately in the same orbit.

65
00:02:58,157 –> 00:03:00,164
The black hole we used
to call Earth will now

66
00:03:00,857 –> 00:03:02,862
continue on orbiting
the Sun in the Earth’s place.

67
00:03:03,363 –> 00:03:05,429
In this case, you also die.

68
00:03:07,934 –> 00:03:10,953
This bonus video was made possible
by your contributions on Patreon.

69
00:03:11,536 –> 00:03:13,541
Thank you so much for your support!

70
00:03:14,098 –> 00:03:17,116
The topic is based on a question on
the AskScience subreddit

71
00:03:17,278 –> 00:03:21,307
and the glorious answer by Matt [Caplin?],
who also worked with us on this video.

72
00:03:22,023 –> 00:03:25,081
Check out his blog, Quarks and Coffee,
for more awesome stuff like this!

73
00:03:25,757 –> 00:03:28,789
If you want to discuss the video,
we have our own subreddit now.

74
00:03:29,643 –> 00:03:33,643
To learn more about black holes or equally
interesting neutron stars, click here.

75
00:03:35,000 –> 00:03:38,000
Subtitles by the Amara.org community